<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SEO Case Study</title>
	<atom:link href="http://charleskirklandblog.com/seo-case-study/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://charleskirklandblog.com/seo-case-study/</link>
	<description>Internet Marketing Made Simple!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 18:17:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hoteis em Foz Do Iguaçu</title>
		<link>http://charleskirklandblog.com/seo-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-4939</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoteis em Foz Do Iguaçu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charleskirklandblog.com/?p=294#comment-4939</guid>
		<description>Great insights!
About step 6... i don&#039;t believe that links from banned sites can harm you. if so, your competitors could have made you lots of troubles! and google knows that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great insights!<br />
About step 6&#8230; i don&#8217;t believe that links from banned sites can harm you. if so, your competitors could have made you lots of troubles! and google knows that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ed elledge</title>
		<link>http://charleskirklandblog.com/seo-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-3987</link>
		<dc:creator>ed elledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 14:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charleskirklandblog.com/?p=294#comment-3987</guid>
		<description>very nice Charles.  
i have been chasing this rainbow for over six months, and i agree with the earlier comment by Eric.  i have made no money yet but that&#039;s my own fault.  however, i have learned a lot, so i have two comments of my own in response.
most of the really good products i would gladly buy - but can&#039;t afford - still have a major flaw.  in all the webinars and so on when you hear &quot;just drive traffic&quot; or &quot;just send traffic&quot; yell right back BINGO!  they skip right past it like that part was too easy to bother with.  like we already have all this extra traffic just lying around with nothing to do.
as you well know it&#039;s all about traffic and conversion.
secondly, the basics of good SEO, on and off page, are not very complicated, but they can be quite tedious, the perfect job to out-source if i could.  you explained it so well in such a short post that i am impressed.  as a would-be writer myself, i like your style.

the important point i would add is that the level of difficulty is actually an edge one can use quite effectively, if done right.  since it is work, hard work if you don&#039;t like doing it, it gets neglected by almost everyone.  yes, pros do it right, mainly, but beginners don&#039;t have that determinaton and education, so there is a glut of what i call deadwood.  if a google search gives back 100,000 results, you can bet that 65,000 more or less, hell maybe 90,000, represents no competition.  in other words, good SEO, as you outlined it, means that one may look at it this way: i&#039;m not trying to beat 100,000.   with all the multiple links to related pages factored in, i really only have to beat out about a thousand - or maybe only a hundred or so real good sites - and quite often they aren&#039;t so good.
all i&#039;m saying is, we shouldn&#039;t let those bigger numbers scare us too much, and, here it comes, wait for it...
a niche with NO or LITTLE competition is mana from heaven if one is living right.

way too long, i know,
happy trails and safe travels, ed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very nice Charles.<br />
i have been chasing this rainbow for over six months, and i agree with the earlier comment by Eric.  i have made no money yet but that&#8217;s my own fault.  however, i have learned a lot, so i have two comments of my own in response.<br />
most of the really good products i would gladly buy &#8211; but can&#8217;t afford &#8211; still have a major flaw.  in all the webinars and so on when you hear &#8220;just drive traffic&#8221; or &#8220;just send traffic&#8221; yell right back BINGO!  they skip right past it like that part was too easy to bother with.  like we already have all this extra traffic just lying around with nothing to do.<br />
as you well know it&#8217;s all about traffic and conversion.<br />
secondly, the basics of good SEO, on and off page, are not very complicated, but they can be quite tedious, the perfect job to out-source if i could.  you explained it so well in such a short post that i am impressed.  as a would-be writer myself, i like your style.</p>
<p>the important point i would add is that the level of difficulty is actually an edge one can use quite effectively, if done right.  since it is work, hard work if you don&#8217;t like doing it, it gets neglected by almost everyone.  yes, pros do it right, mainly, but beginners don&#8217;t have that determinaton and education, so there is a glut of what i call deadwood.  if a google search gives back 100,000 results, you can bet that 65,000 more or less, hell maybe 90,000, represents no competition.  in other words, good SEO, as you outlined it, means that one may look at it this way: i&#8217;m not trying to beat 100,000.   with all the multiple links to related pages factored in, i really only have to beat out about a thousand &#8211; or maybe only a hundred or so real good sites &#8211; and quite often they aren&#8217;t so good.<br />
all i&#8217;m saying is, we shouldn&#8217;t let those bigger numbers scare us too much, and, here it comes, wait for it&#8230;<br />
a niche with NO or LITTLE competition is mana from heaven if one is living right.</p>
<p>way too long, i know,<br />
happy trails and safe travels, ed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Haaranen</title>
		<link>http://charleskirklandblog.com/seo-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-3762</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Haaranen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 13:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charleskirklandblog.com/?p=294#comment-3762</guid>
		<description>Hi Charles,

This is one of the best summaries of SEO strategy I have come across - and this is the kind of stuff that anyone can do very easily.  Great job and thanks for sharing this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Charles,</p>
<p>This is one of the best summaries of SEO strategy I have come across &#8211; and this is the kind of stuff that anyone can do very easily.  Great job and thanks for sharing this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melanie Acklin</title>
		<link>http://charleskirklandblog.com/seo-case-study/comment-page-1/#comment-2160</link>
		<dc:creator>Melanie Acklin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charleskirklandblog.com/?p=294#comment-2160</guid>
		<description>I just signd up as an affiliate.  Would love some advice for a low budget rookie with very limited computer skills- haven&#039;t yet learned what all the terms mean.  I don&#039;t have a webpage yet.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just signd up as an affiliate.  Would love some advice for a low budget rookie with very limited computer skills- haven&#8217;t yet learned what all the terms mean.  I don&#8217;t have a webpage yet.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

